Development and preliminary study of the rLiNTPDase2 rapid test: A lateral flow immunochromatographic assay for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis.

Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis (CVL) is the most fatal form of Leishmania infection in dogs and is caused by L. infantum in the Americas. This parasite follows a zoonotic life cycle, raising concerns within domestic households, where dogs act as the primary reservoir of the parasite. Accurately detecting infected dogs is vital for effective epidemiological control in both canine and human populations. However, existing diagnostic methods in Brazil have limitations, particularly in detecting asymptomatic and oligosymptomatic dogs, leading to ineffective disease control. To address this challenge, we evaluated a novel recombinant antigen from L. infantum, the rLiNTPDase2. Previous studies have confirmed its high performance via ELISA, leading us to assess its suitability for a Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Assay (LFIA), which is ideal for point-of-care testing. Standardization of the assay involved testing two nitrocellulose membranes (HF135 and HF120, Millipore), three blocking protocols, and five sample dilutions (1:10, 1:20, 1:40, 1:80, and 1:160). Following the chosen conditions (HF120 membrane, 1-minute blocking protocol, and 1:80 sample dilution), we validated our assay with a sample size of 78 dogs, comprising 32 negatives and 46 positives, including symptomatic (n=23), oligosymptomatic (n=17), and asymptomatic (n=6) cases. The results revealed a sensitivity of 86.9 %, specificity of 62.5 %, and accuracy of 76.9 %, which is consistent with ELISA performance for the same samples. Compared to DPP-LVC, our assay demonstrated promising results in detecting asymptomatic and oligosymptomatic cases. This study underscores the suitability of the rLiNTPDase2 antigen for the LFIA format, suggesting its potential as a novel point-of-care diagnostic test for CVL.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)