Total Copper and Labile Bound Copper Fraction as a Selective and Sensitive Tool in the Evaluation of Wilson Disease.

Background: A dual filtration-based method for determination of serum labile bound copper (LBC) and LBC fraction (LBC/total copper) was developed. Reduced total copper, elevated LBC, and elevated LBC fraction have been reported in Wilson disease (WD).
Methods: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of these markers, samples were obtained from 21 WD treatment-naïve (WD-TN, no WD treatment or <28 days of treatment) patients, 46 WD standard-of-care-treated (WD-SOC) patients, along with 246 patients representing other potential disorders of copper status. These were then compared to 213 reference interval population patients.
Results: Receiver operating characteristic curves for the reference population vs WD-TN yielded areas under the curve for total copper, LBC, and LBC fraction, of 0.99, 0.81, and 0.98, respectively. Using Youden cutoffs, sensitivity/specificity for WD-TN was 95%/97% for total copper, 71%/85% for LBC, and 95%/94% for LBC fraction. LBC values, but not total copper and LBC fraction, differed substantially between WD-TN and WD-SOC cohorts.We propose a dual model wherein total copper and LBC fraction results must agree to be classified as a "positive" or "negative" result for WD. This correctly classified 19/21 WD-TN patients as positive, and 194/213 reference interval patients as negative. The remaining "indeterminate" patients (representing approximately 9% of the reference and the WD-TN populations) exhibited conflicting total copper and LBC fraction results. When indeterminate results are excluded, this model exhibited apparent 100% sensitivity/specificity.
Conclusions: Agreement of total serum copper and LBC fraction classification may constitute an effective "rule-in" and "rule-out" assessment for WD-TN patients.
(© Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)