Back to Search Start Over

Do immunosuppressive treatments influence immune responses against adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccines in patients with multiple sclerosis? An Argentine multicenter study.

Authors :
Silva BA
Miglietta E
Casabona JC
Wenker S
Eizaguirre MB
Alonso R
Casas M
Lázaro LG
Man F
Portuondo G
Lopez Bisso A
Zavala N
Casales F
Imhoff G
Steinberg DJ
López PA
Carnero Contentti E
Deri N
Sinay V
Hryb J
Chiganer E
Leguizamon F
Tkachuk V
Bauer J
Ferrandina F
Giachello S
Henestroza P
Garcea O
Pascuale CA
Heitrich M
Podhajcer OL
Vinzón S
D'Alotto-Moreno T
Benatar A
Rabinovich GA
Pitossi FJ
Ferrari CC
Source :
Frontiers in immunology [Front Immunol] 2024 Aug 19; Vol. 15, pp. 1431403. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 19 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: There are no reports in LATAM related to longitudinal humoral and cellular response to adenovirus based COVID-19 vaccines in people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) under different disease modifying therapies (DMTs) and neutralization of the Omicron and Wuhan variants of SARS-COV-2.<br />Methods: IgG anti- SARS-COV-2 spike titer were measured in a cohort of 101 pwMS under fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, cladribine and antiCD20, as well as 28 healthy controls (HC) were measured 6 weeks after vaccination with 2 <superscript>nd</superscript> dose (Sputnik V or AZD1222) and 3 <superscript>nd</superscript> dose (homologous or heterologous schedule). Neutralizing capacity was against Omicron (BA.1) and Wuhan (D614G) variants and pseudotyped particles and Cellular response were analyzed.<br />Results: Multivariate regression analysis showed anti-cd20 (β= -,349, 95% CI: -3655.6 - -369.01, p=0.017) and fingolimod (β=-,399, 95% CI: -3363.8 - -250.9, p=0.023) treatments as an independent factor associated with low antibody response (r <superscript>2</superscript> adjusted=0.157). After the 2nd dose we found a correlation between total and neutralizing titers against D614G (rho=0.6; p<0.001; slope 0.8, 95%CI:0.4-1.3), with no differences between DMTs. Neutralization capacity was lower for BA.1 (slope 0.3, 95%CI:0.1-0.4). After the 3rd dose, neutralization of BA.1 improved (slope: 0.9 95%CI:0.6-1.2), without differences between DMTs. A fraction of pwMS generated anti-Spike CD4+ and CD8+ T cell response. In contrast, pwMS under antiCD20 generated CD8+TNF+IL2+ response without differences with HC, even in the absence of humoral response. The 3rd dose significantly increased the neutralization against the Omicron, as observed in the immunocompetent population.<br />Discussion: Findings regarding humoral and cellular response are consistent with previous reports.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that this study received funding from Novartis and donations from Merck Argentina and Synthon Bagó. The funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication. Author Berenice Anabel Silva, as principal investigator, received a 2-year research grant from the Research Council of the Ministry of Health of the Government of the City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Silva, Miglietta, Casabona, Wenker, Eizaguirre, Alonso, Casas, Lázaro, Man, Portuondo, Lopez Bisso, Zavala, Casales, Imhoff, Steinberg, López, Carnero Contentti, Deri, Sinay, Hryb, Chiganer, Leguizamon, Tkachuk, Bauer, Ferrandina, Giachello, Henestroza, Garcea, Pascuale, Heitrich, Podhajcer, Vinzón, D’Alotto-Moreno, Benatar, Rabinovich, Pitossi and Ferrari.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1664-3224
Volume :
15
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in immunology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39224589
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1431403