Back to Search Start Over

Weight-Based Standardized Sugammadex Dosing in Pediatrics: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Compliance with Dosing Guidelines and Reduce Waste and Cost.

Authors :
Brown SES
Meyer M
Meyer A
Cassidy R
Zhao X
Wagner D
Wetzel L
Colquhoun DA
Source :
Anesthesiology research and practice [Anesthesiol Res Pract] 2024 Aug 24; Vol. 2024, pp. 6049114. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 24 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Methods: Sugammadex vials were fractionated into 25, 50, or 100 mg aliquots, which would be distributed to anesthesia staff by pharmacy staff in approximate 2 mg/kg of actual body weight doses (±10%). We analyzed changes in sugammadex waste and dosing practices 1/1/2019 to 3/15/2023 pre/postintervention (4/1/2021). We gauged dose appropriateness using last train of four (TOF) prior to sugammadex administration.<br />Results: 7,889 patients 2-17 years (4,771 with documented TOF), ASA 1-4 receiving general anesthesia with a steroidal NMB medication and sugammadex reversal. Pre- and postintervention mean doses were 2.5 mg/kg (SD: 1.2) and 2.4 mg/kg (SD: 0.96), respectively. A smaller proportion of cases received standard 2 or 4 mg/kg doses (pre: 77.6 vs. post: 66.7%). Mean waste per case declined from 4.2 mg/kg (SD: 4.1) to 0.22 mg/kg (SD: 0.38). Among cases with 0 or 1 measured twitches on TOF that should receive at least 4 mg/kg, fewer received at least 3.6 mg/kg (post: 56.7% vs. pre: 66.8%), and a greater proportion received less than 2.2 mg/kg (post: 27.4% vs. pre: 20.7%). Among cases that should have received at least 2 mg/kg by TOF, the proportion of patients receiving more than 3.6 mg/kg declined from 9.5% to 5.2%. Discussion . Fractionating sugammadex vials was associated with decreases in waste, but not dose, and significant underdosing was more likely to occur. While vial fractionation could enable increased access to sugammadex and other costly medications, it may introduce unintended consequences.<br />Competing Interests: Drs. Brown and Colquhoun declare research support unrelated to current project from Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck and Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey), and Chiesi USA, Inc. (Cary, NC), paid to the University of Michigan. Dr. Colquhoun reports honorarium from Medscape, Inc. neither Merck and Co., Inc., nor Medscape, Inc. had an impact on the results or outcomes of the study.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Sydney E. S. Brown et al.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1687-6962
Volume :
2024
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Anesthesiology research and practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39221435
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6049114