Back to Search Start Over

End Point Surrogacy in First-Line Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors :
Simon F
Ligtvoet R
Robrecht S
Cramer P
Kutsch N
Fürstenau M
Goede V
von Tresckow J
Langerbeins P
Fink AM
Huber H
Tausch E
Schneider C
Wendtner CM
Ritgen M
Dreyling M
Müller L
Jacobasch L
Heinz WJ
Vehling-Kaiser U
Sivcheva L
Böttcher S
Dreger P
Illmer T
Gregor M
Staber PB
Stilgenbauer S
Niemann CU
Kater AP
Fischer K
Eichhorst B
Hallek M
Al-Sawaf O
Source :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2024 Aug 23, pp. JCO2401192. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 23.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Purpose: Surrogate end points are commonly used to estimate treatment efficacy in clinical studies of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This patient- and trial-level analysis describes the correlation between progression-free survival (PFS) and minimal residual disease (MRD) with overall survival (OS) in first-line trials for CLL.<br />Patients and Methods: First, patient-level correlation was confirmed using source data from 12 frontline German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG)-trials. Additionally, a joint-frailty copula model was fitted to validate correlation in the setting of targeted therapies (TT). Second, a meta-analysis of first-line phase III trials in CLL from 2008 to 2024 was performed. Treatment effect correlation was quantified from seven GCLLSG and nine published trials, using hazard ratios (HRs) for time-to-event and odds ratios for binary end points.<br />Results: The GCLLSG analysis set comprised 4,237 patients. Patient-level correlation for PFS/OS was strong with Spearman Rho >0.9. The joint-frailty copula indicated a weak correlation for chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy (C/CIT) with a tau of 0.52 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.55) while the correlation was strong for TT (tau, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.89 to 0.93). The meta-analysis set contained a total of 8,065 patients including 5,198 (64%) patients treated with C/CIT and 2,867 (36%) treated with TT. Treatment-effect correlation of the HRs for PFS and OS was R = 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.76, R <superscript>2</superscript> = 0.56) while correlation of end-of-treatment MRD with PFS and OS was R = 0.88 (95% CI, -0.87 to 0.89; R <superscript>2</superscript> = 0.78) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.73; R <superscript>2</superscript> = 0.5), respectively.<br />Conclusion: Patient-level correlation was confirmed in the setting of TTs while treatment-effect correlation between PFS and OS remains uncertain. MRD response status showed a high treatment-effect correlation with PFS but not OS, with the caveat of a limited number of randomized trials with available MRD data.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-7755
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39213466
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.01192