Back to Search Start Over

The Emission of Internal Conversion Electrons Rather Than Auger Electrons Increased the Nucleus-Absorbed Dose for 161 Tb Compared with 177 Lu with a Higher Dose Response for [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 Than for [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTATATE.

Authors :
Spoormans K
Struelens L
Vermeulen K
De Saint-Hubert M
Koole M
Crabbé M
Source :
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine [J Nucl Med] 2024 Oct 01; Vol. 65 (10), pp. 1619-1625. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 01.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Preclinical data have shown that <superscript>161</superscript> Tb-labeled peptides targeting the somatostatin receptor are therapeutically more effective for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy than are their <superscript>177</superscript> Lu-labeled counterparts. To further substantiate this enhanced therapeutic effect, we performed cellular dosimetry to quantify the absorbed dose to the cell nucleus and compared dose-response curves to evaluate differences in relative biological effectiveness in vitro. Methods: CA20948 cell survival was assessed after treatment with [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb- and [ <superscript>177</superscript> Lu]Lu-DOTATATE (agonist) and with [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb- and [ <superscript>177</superscript> Lu]Lu-DOTA-LM3 (antagonist) via a clonogenic assay. Cell binding, internalization, and dissociation assays were performed up to 7 d to acquire time-integrated activity coefficients. Separate S values for each type of particle emission (Auger/internal conversion [IC] electrons and β <superscript>-</superscript> particles) were computed via Monte Carlo simulations, while considering spheric cells. Once the absorbed dose to the cell nucleus was calculated, survival curves were fitted to the appropriate linear or linear-quadratic model and corresponding relative biological effectiveness was evaluated. Results: Although the radiopeptide uptake was independent of the radionuclide, [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTATATE and [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 delivered a 3.6 and 3.8 times higher dose to the nucleus, respectively, than their <superscript>177</superscript> Lu-labeled counterparts on saturated receptor binding. This increased nucleus-absorbed dose was mainly due to the additional emission of IC and not Auger electrons by <superscript>161</superscript> Tb. When activity concentrations were considered, both [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTATATE and [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 showed a lower survival fraction than did labeling with <superscript>177</superscript> Lu. When the absorbed dose to the nucleus was considered, no significant difference could be observed between the dose-response curves for [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb- and [ <superscript>177</superscript> Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 showed a linear-quadratic dose response, whereas [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTATATE showed only a linear dose response within the observed dose range, suggesting additional cell membrane damage by Auger electrons. Conclusion: The IC, rather than Auger, electrons emitted by <superscript>161</superscript> Tb resulted in a higher absorbed dose to the cell nucleus and lower clonogenic survival for [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTATATE and [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 than for the <superscript>177</superscript> Lu-labeled analogs. In contrast, [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTATATE showed no higher dose response than [ <superscript>177</superscript> Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, whereas for [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 an additional quadratic response was observed. Because of this quadratic response, potentially caused by cell membrane damage, [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 is a more effective radiopeptide than [ <superscript>161</superscript> Tb]Tb-DOTATATE for labeling with <superscript>161</superscript> Tb.<br /> (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1535-5667
Volume :
65
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39209546
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267873