[Professional Health Literacy of General Practitioners - Results of the HLS-PROF].

Aim: To date, there are only a few studies analyzing health professionals' health literacy (HL). Mostly, the focus has been on personal rather than professional HL. To bridge this gap, a new concept and an associated survey instrument have been developed in a three-country consortium. The aim of this article was to examine the professional HL of general practitioners (GPs) in Germany.
Method: The survey instrument used consists of 34 items and assesses subjective difficulties in four dimensions to be addressed in promoting patients' HL: "information and knowledge management", "conveying information and knowledge", "patient-centred communication", "professional digital HL". A total of 297 GPs and internists working in general practice were surveyed online over the summer of 2022. The professional HL (score from 0 to 100) was analyzed descriptively and examined in relation to gender, selected job-related, and organizational characteristics, using multiple linear regression.
Results: Depending on the four areas, GPs achieved approximately half to almost three-quarters of the highest possible score. The dimension "patient-centred communication" was perceived as the easiest, followed by "information and knowledge management", and "conveying information and knowledge". The most challenging dimension was "professional digital HL". According to the multivariate analysis, professional HL shows a relation to gender, organizational framework and training conditions, job duration, and coping with the diversity of digital information. The strength of correlation varies by area and is rather weak in some instances.
Conclusions: The results demonstrate the importance of promoting professional HL of GPs and provide numerous indications of where to start. They also indicate that the regression models should be extended by additional determinants, since the included variables can explain only a small amount of variance.
Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
(The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)