Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and safety of a single-use cholangioscope for percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy.

Authors :
Boskoski I
Beyna T
Lau JY
Lemmers A
Fotoohi M
Ramchandani M
Pontecorvi V
Peetermans J
Shlomovitz E
Source :
Endoscopy international open [Endosc Int Open] 2024 Aug 23; Vol. 12 (8), pp. E981-E988. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 23 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and study aims Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS) is a management option for patients in whom peroral cholangioscopy or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fail. We conducted a case series on the efficacy and safety of PTCS using a cholangiopancreatoscope cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2020. Patients and methods Fifty adult patients scheduled for PTCS or other cholangioscopic procedure were enrolled at seven academic medical centers and followed for 30 days after the index procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was achievement of clinical intent by 30 days after the index PTCS procedure. Secondary endpoints included technical success, procedure time, endoscopist ratings of device attributes on a scale of 1 to 10 (best), and serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the device or procedure. Results Patients had a mean age of 64.7±15.9 years, and 60.0% (30/50) were male. Forty-four patients (88.0%) achieved clinical intent by 30 days post-procedure. The most common reasons for the percutaneous approach were past (38.0%) or anticipated (30.0%) failed ERCP. The technical success rate was 96.0% (48/50), with a mean procedure time of 37.6 minutes (SD, 25.1; range 5.0-125.0). The endoscopist rated the overall ability of the cholangioscope to complete the procedure as a mean 9.2 (SD, 1.6; range 1.0-10.0). Two patients (4.0%) experienced related SAEs, one of whom had a fatal periprocedure aspiration. Conclusions PTCS is an important endoscopic option for selected patients with impossible retrograde access or in whom ERCP fails. Because of the associated risk, this technique should be practiced by highly trained endoscopists at high-volume centers. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04580940).<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Ivo Boskoski: Consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Nitinotes, Erbe Elektromedizin, Pentax Medical, Fractyl Health, and Lecturer for Microteach. Torsten Beyna: (Competing interests relevant to this publication) paid consultancy for Olympus, Boston Scientific, Microtech Endoscopy. James Lau: Consultant for Boston Scientific. Arnaud Lemmers: Research grants from Boston Scientific and Medtronic Mehran Fotoohi: No disclosures. Mohan Ramchandani: No disclosures. Valerio Pontecorvi: No disclosures. Joyce A. Peetermans: Full-time employee of Boston Scientific. Eran Shlomovitz: Consultant for Boston Scientific.<br /> (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2364-3722
Volume :
12
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Endoscopy international open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39184059
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2366-2265