Back to Search
Start Over
Study of the uptake mechanism of two small extracellular vesicle subtypes by granulosa cells.
- Source :
-
Animal reproduction science [Anim Reprod Sci] 2024 Nov; Vol. 270, pp. 107576. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 12. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- As a new mechanism of intercellular communication, the uptake of extracellular vesicles (EVs) by receptor cells has become a hot topic in the field. Previously, research on the uptake of EVs has focused on the mechanism of small EVs (sEVs, also known as exosomes). As sEVs represent a mixed heterogeneous population, the issue of whether there are different uptake mechanisms for different subsets of sEVs by recipient cells urgently need to be addressed. There are EVs in follicular fluid, which play an important role in the communication between follicular cells and the development of oocytes. Previously, we isolated two subtypes of sEVs in follicular fluid: low density-sEVs (LD-sEVs) and high density-sEVs (HD-sEVs). The current study aimed to explore the uptake characteristics of these two subtypes of sEVs by granulosa cells. First, PKH67 was used to label the two sEVs subtypes, and we observed their uptake by granulosa cells using confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. We then explored the specific mechanisms underlying uptake of these two sEV subtypes by granulosa cells using specific inhibitors and RNA interference. The results showed that granulosa cells took up both kinds of sEVs through a clathrin-independent pathway. In addition to requiring caveolin, cholesterol, and Na+/H+ exchange, the uptake of HD-sEVs also depended on the activity of tyrosine kinase and phosphoinositide 3-kinase. A better understanding of the mechanism of granulosa cell uptake of different subtypes of sEVs in follicular fluid is of considerable significance leading to more accurate use of EVs for targeted treatment of infertility and other related diseases.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1873-2232
- Volume :
- 270
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Animal reproduction science
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39178587
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2024.107576