In pancreatic cancer patients, chemotherapy reshapes the gene expression profile and antigen receptor repertoire of T lymphocytes and enhances their effector response to tumor-associated antigens.

Introduction: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDA) is one of the most aggressive malignancies with a 5-year survival rate of 13%. Less than 20% of patients have a resectable tumor at diagnosis due to the lack of distinctive symptoms and reliable biomarkers. PDA is resistant to chemotherapy (CT) and understanding how to gain an anti-tumor effector response following stimulation is, therefore, critical for setting up an effective immunotherapy.
Methods: Proliferation, and cytokine release and TCRB repertoire of from PDA patient peripheral T lymphocytes, before and after CT, were analyzed in vitro in response to four tumor-associated antigens (TAA), namely ENO1, FUBP1, GAPDH and K2C8. Transcriptional state of PDA patient PBMC was investigated using RNA-Seq before and after CT.
Results: CT increased the number of TAA recognized by T lymphocytes, which positively correlated with patient survival, and high IFN-γ production TAA-induced responses were significantly increased after CT. We found that some ENO1-stimulated T cell clonotypes from CT-treated patients were expanded or de-novo induced, and that some clonotypes were reduced or even disappeared after CT. Patients that showed a higher number of effector responses to TAA (high IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio) after CT expressed increased fatty acid-related transcriptional signature. Conversely, patients that showed a higher number of regulatory responses to TAA (low IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio) after CT significantly expressed an increased IRAK1/IL1R axis-related transcriptional signature.
Conclusion: These data suggest that the expression of fatty acid or IRAK1/IL1Rrelated genes predicts T lymphocyte effector or regulatory responses to TAA in patients that undergo CT. These findings are a springboard to set up precision immunotherapies in PDA based on the TAA vaccination in combination with CT.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
(Copyright © 2024 Brugiapaglia, Bulfamante, Curcio, Arigoni, Calogero, Bonello, Genuardi, Spadi, Satolli, Campra, Giordano, Cappello, Cordero and Novelli.)