Back to Search Start Over

Alternative for HPC22 after repairs in the drinking water distribution system.

Authors :
van der Waals MJ
van Bel N
van Charante F
van Rijn J
van der Veen A
van der Wielen PWJJ
Source :
Water research [Water Res] 2024 Nov 01; Vol. 265, pp. 122264. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 15.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

There is a risk of contamination by (pathogenic) microorganisms from the outside environment into the drinking water during maintenance or pipe breaches in the drinking water distribution system (DWDS) and, consequently, the drinking water distributed to consumers may result in possible detrimental effects on public health. Traditional time-consuming microbiological testing is, therefore, performed to confirm drinking water is not microbially contaminated. This is done by culturing methods of the faecal indicators Escherichia coli, intestinal enterococci and the technical parameters coliform bacteria and heterotrophic plate counts at 22 °C (HPC22). In this study, fast methods (adenosine triphosphate (ATP), flow cytometry, enzyme activity and qPCR) were compared as an alternative for HPC22. Using dilution series and field samples, ATP (ATP <subscript>total-lab</subscript> and ATP <subscript>cell-mob</subscript> ) and enzymatic activity (ALP-2) methods proved to be the more reliable and sensitive than flow cytometry and qPCR methods for detecting microbiological contaminations in drinking water. Significant (p < 0.05) and relatively strong correlations (R <superscript>2</superscript> = 0.61-0.76) were obtained between HPC22 and both ATP methods, enzyme activity and qPCR parameters, but relations with flow cytometry were weak (R <superscript>2</superscript> = 0.24 - 0.52). The samples taken after repairs or a calamity from the DWDS showed in general limited variation in the HPC22 count and were in most cases below the guidance level of 1,000 CFU/mL. We recommend that the best performing alternative methods, i.e. ATP <subscript>total-lab</subscript> and ATP <subscript>cell-mob</subscript> and ALP-2, should be included next to HPC22 in additional field studies to further test and compare these methods to be able to decide which fast method can replace HPC22 analysis after maintenance work in the DWDS.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-2448
Volume :
265
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Water research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39173355
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122264