Do peri-operative changes in voiding function and pelvic organ mobility predict improvement in urgency urinary incontinence following prolapse surgery?

Objectives: To evaluate whether peri-operative changes in voiding function, pelvic organ descent and urethral mobility predict improvement in urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) following prolapse surgery.
Methods: A retrospective study of women undergoing prolapse surgery without a history of or without a concomitant anti-incontinence surgery at a tertiary unit between 2005 and 2019. All patients underwent a pre- and post-operative standardised interview, POP-Q examination, uroflowmetry and 4D translabial ultrasound. Post processing of ultrasound volume data was performed to assess pelvic organ descent and functional urethral anatomy.
Results: The datasets of 123 women were analysed. Mean follow-up was 5.5 months (SD 3.2). Mean age was 61 years (SD 11.7). UUI was reported by 68 before and 44 after operation (p = 0.001 for the reduction). Among those with pre-operative UUI, 34 reported cure of UUI, 20 improvement, 9 no change and 5 worsened UUI after their operation. De novo UUI was reported in 11. Fifty-seven women reported voiding dysfunction before and 32 after operation (p = 0.09 for the reduction). Abnormal uroflowmetry was noted in 63 women before and 37 after operation (p = 0.003 for change). On binary logistic regression, improved/cured UUI was associated with improved subjective voiding function (p = 0.003) and reduced residual urine volume (p = 0.02), but not with peri-operative changes in pelvic organ descent or functional urethral anatomy.
Conclusion: Prolapse surgery resulted in short- to medium- term improvement in UUI. This was associated with subjective improvement in voiding function and with a reduction in post-void residual urine volume.
Summary: Prolapse surgery was associated with improvement in UUI which in turn was associated with subjectively improved voiding and reduced residual urine volume.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Victoria A. Buckley: None. Ka Lai Shek: None. Hans Peter Dietz: Travel support and Consultancy payments from Materna Medical, GE Medical and Mindray.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)