Back to Search Start Over

Success factors for interventions to reduce low-value imaging. Six crucial lessons learned from a practical case study in Norway.

Authors :
Hofmann B
Andersen ER
Brandsæter IØ
Clement F
Elshaug AG
Bryan S
Aslaksen A
Hjørleifsson S
Lauritzen PM
Johansen BK
von Schweder GJ
Nomme F
Kjelle E
Source :
Current problems in diagnostic radiology [Curr Probl Diagn Radiol] 2024 Nov-Dec; Vol. 53 (6), pp. 670-676. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 14.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Substantial overuse of health care services is identified and intensified efforts are incited to reduce low-value services in general and in imaging in particular.<br />Objective: To report crucial success factors for developing and implementing interventions to reduce specific low-value imaging examinations based on a case study in Norway.<br />Materials and Methods: Mixed methods design including one systematic review, one scoping review, implementation science, qualitative interviews, content analysis of stakeholders' input, and stakeholder deliberations.<br />Results: The description and analysis of an intervention to reduce low-value imaging in Norway identifies six general success factors: 1) Acknowledging complexity: advanced knowledge synthesis, competence of the context, and broad and strong stakeholder involvement is crucial to manage de-implementation complexity. 2) Clear consensus-based criteria for selecting low-value imaging procedures are key. 3) Having a clear target group is critical. 4) Stakeholder engagement is essential to ascertain intervention relevance and compliance. 5) Active and well-motivated intervention collaborators is imperative. 6) Paying close attention to the mechanisms of low-value imaging and the barriers to reduce it is decisive.<br />Conclusion: Reducing low-value imaging is crucial to increase the quality, safety, efficiency, and sustainability of the health services. Reducing low-value imaging is a complex task and paying attention to specific practical success factors is key.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1535-6302
Volume :
53
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Current problems in diagnostic radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39164183
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.08.007