Using algorithmic game theory to improve supervised machine learning: A novel applicability approach in flood susceptibility mapping.

This study was carried out with the aim of applying Condorcet and Borda scoring algorithms based on Game Theory (GT) to determine flood points and Flood Susceptibility Mapping (FSM) based on Machine Learning Algorithms (MLA) including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) in the Cheshmeh-Kileh watershed, Iran. Therefore, first, FS conditioning factors including Aspect (A _s ), Elevation (E _l ), Euclidean distance (Euc), Forest (F), NDVI, Precipitation (P), Plan Curvature (P _l C), Profile Curvature (P _r C), Residential (R _e ), Rangeland (R _l ), Slope (S _l ), Stream Power Index (SPI), Topographic Position Index (TPI), and Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) were quantified in each Sub-Watershed (SW). Based on this, flood and non-flood points were identified based on both GT algorithms. In the following, MLAs including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) were used for the distributional mapping of FS. Finally, based on optimal conjunct approaches, FS maps were presented in the study watershed. Based on the results, among the conjunct algorithms in FS classification, RF-Condorcet and RF-Borda models were selected as the most optimal MLA-GT hybrid models. The upstream SWs were highly susceptible. Also, the effectiveness of NDVI and forest conditioning factors in each classification approach was high. The similarity of SW prioritization based on Condorcet algorithm with RF-Condorcet algorithm was about 86.70%. Meanwhile, the degree of similarity in RF-Borda conjunct algorithm was around 73.33%. These results showed that Condorcet algorithm had an optimal classification compared to Borda scoring algorithm.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)