Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Antiplatelet Therapy on 5-Year Outcomes After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Deferral of Revascularization in Nonsignificant Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors :
Kurita T
Kuramitsu S
Ishii M
Takasaki A
Domei T
Matsuo H
Horie K
Ando H
Terai H
Kikuta Y
Ishihara T
Saigusa T
Sakamoto T
Suematsu N
Shiono Y
Asano T
Tsujita K
Masamura K
Doijiri T
Toyota F
Ogita M
Shiraishi J
Harada K
Isogai H
Anai R
Sonoda S
Yokoi H
Tanaka N
Dohi K
Source :
Circulation reports [Circ Rep] 2024 Jul 20; Vol. 6 (8), pp. 313-321. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 20 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Because the clinical benefit of antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease (CAD) remains poorly understood, we evaluated it in patients after fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided deferral of revascularization.<br />Methods and Results: From the J-CONFIRM (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients with Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), we investigated 265 patients with deferred lesions who did not require APT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. A 2-year landmark analysis assessed the relationship between APT at 2 years and 5-year major cardiac adverse events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization). Of the 265 patients, 163 (61.5%) received APT. The 5-year MACE did not significantly differ between the APT and non-APT groups after adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics (9.2% vs. 6.9%, inverse probability weighted hazard ratio, 1.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.53-3.69]; P=0.49). There was a marginal interaction between the effect of APT on MACE and FFR values (< or ≥0.84) (P for interaction=0.066).<br />Conclusions: The 5-year outcomes after FFR-guided deferral of revascularization did not significantly differ between the APT and non-APT groups, suggesting that APT might not be a critical requirement for nonsignificant obstructive CAD patients not requiring APT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.<br />Competing Interests: S.K. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan and Boston Scientific Japan; H.M. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan, Boston Scientific Japan, and Phillips Japan; Y.K. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan and Phillips Japan; Y.S. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan and Phillips Japan; T.A. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan and Phillips Japan; K.T. is a member of Circulation Journal’s and Circulation Reports’ Editorial Team; N.T. receives lecture fees from Abbott Vascular Japan and Boston Scientific Japan; H.Y. receives lecture fees from Boston Scientific Japan. The other authors report no conflicts.<br /> (Copyright © 2024, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2434-0790
Volume :
6
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39132333
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0069