The Utility and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients Diagnosed With Cervical Cystic Lesions.

Introduction: This observation study aimed to differentiate between lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH) and gastric-type mucinous carcinoma (GAS) while evaluating the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in the preoperative diagnosis of cervical cystic lesions.
Method and Material: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic process and laparoscopic surgical management of cervical cystic lesions suspected to be LEGH or GAS. Preoperatively and postoperatively, MRI, cytology, histology, tumor marker analysis, and surgical outcomes (blood loss during surgery, operative time) were assessed. Six individuals were selected based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results indicating a preoperative suspicion of LEGH or GAS. These patients underwent laparoscopic surgical treatment without indications of malignancy based on preoperative histology or cytology.
Results: Initially, all individuals were suspected to have LEGH based on MRI findings. Postoperatively, two patients were diagnosed with LEGH, two with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (MDA), and two showed no notable findings on pathology (one diagnosed endometrioid carcinoma in endometrial tissue). Patients with malignancies exhibited longer surgical times and higher intraoperative blood loss. Preoperatively, no significant variation was observed in maximal lesion diameter between adenocarcinoma and LEGH. However, lesion diameter increased significantly over time in patients with GAS.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery demonstrated feasibility and provided crucial diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes, with no postoperative recurrence observed in cases of malignancy, despite the challenges associated with preoperative differentiation. These findings underscore the potential of laparoscopic surgery in enhancing both diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy for cervical cystic lesions, offering promise for improved patient outcomes and management strategies in clinical practice.
Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
(Copyright © 2024, Horibe et al.)