Back to Search Start Over

Realizing Textbook Outcomes Following Liver Resection for Hepatic Neoplasms with Development and Validation of a Predictive Nomogram.

Authors :
Gundavda KK
Patkar S
Kannan S
Varty GP
Nandy K
Shah T
Polusany K
Solanki SL
Kulkarni S
Shetty N
Gala K
Ostwal V
Ramaswamy A
Bhargava P
Goel M
Source :
Annals of surgical oncology [Ann Surg Oncol] 2024 Nov; Vol. 31 (12), pp. 7870-7881. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 05.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: 'Textbook Outcome' (TO) represents an effort to define a standardized, composite quality benchmark based on intraoperative and postoperative endpoints. This study aimed to assess the applicability of TO as an outcome measure following liver resection for hepatic neoplasms from a low- to middle-income economy and determine its impact on long-term survival. Based on identified perioperative predictors, we developed and validated a nomogram-based scoring and risk stratification system.<br />Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing curative resections for hepatic neoplasms between 2012 and 2023. Rates of TO were assessed over time and factors associated with achieving a TO were evaluated. Using stepwise regression, a prediction nomogram for achieving TO was established based on perioperative risk factors.<br />Results: Of the 1018 consecutive patients who underwent liver resections, a TO was achieved in 64.9% (661/1018). The factor most responsible for not achieving TO was significant post-hepatectomy liver failure (22%). Realization of TO was independently associated with improved overall and disease-free survival. On logistic regression, American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 2 (p = 0.0002), perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (p = 0.011), major hepatectomy (p = 0.0006), blood loss >1500 mL (p = 0.007), and presence of lymphovascular emboli on pathology (p = 0.026) were associated with the non-realization of TO. These independent risk factors were integrated into a nomogram prediction model with the predictive efficiency for TO (area under the curve 75.21%, 95% confidence interval 70.69-79.72%).<br />Conclusion: TO is a realizable outcome measure and should be adopted. We recommend the use of the nomogram proposed as a convenient tool for patient selection and prognosticating outcomes following hepatectomy.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1534-4681
Volume :
31
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of surgical oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39103690
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15983-6