Back to Search Start Over

Trends and Disparities in Ambulatory Follow-Up After Cardiovascular Hospitalizations : A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors :
Anderson TS
Yeh RW
Herzig SJ
Marcantonio ER
Hatfield LA
Souza J
Landon BE
Source :
Annals of internal medicine [Ann Intern Med] 2024 Sep; Vol. 177 (9), pp. 1190-1198. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 06.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Timely follow-up after cardiovascular hospitalization is recommended to monitor recovery, titrate medications, and coordinate care.<br />Objective: To describe trends and disparities in follow-up after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations.<br />Design: Retrospective cohort study.<br />Setting: Medicare.<br />Participants: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries hospitalized between 2010 and 2019.<br />Measurements: Receipt of a cardiology visit within 30 days of discharge. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate changes over time overall and across 5 sociodemographic characteristics on the basis of known disparities in cardiovascular outcomes.<br />Results: The cohort included 1 678 088 AMI and 4 245 665 HF hospitalizations. Between 2010 and 2019, the rate of cardiology follow-up increased from 48.3% to 61.4% for AMI hospitalizations and from 35.2% to 48.3% for HF hospitalizations. For both conditions, follow-up rates increased for all subgroups, yet disparities worsened for Hispanic patients with AMI and patients with HF who were Asian, Black, Hispanic, Medicaid dual eligible, and residents of counties with higher levels of social deprivation. By 2019, the largest disparities were between Black and White patients (AMI, 51.9% vs. 59.8%, difference, 7.9 percentage points [pp] [95% CI, 6.8 to 9.0 pp]; HF, 39.8% vs. 48.7%, difference, 8.9 pp [CI, 8.2 to 9.7 pp]) and Medicaid dual-eligible and non-dual-eligible patients (AMI, 52.8% vs. 60.4%, difference, 7.6 pp [CI, 6.9 to 8.4 pp]; HF, 39.7% vs. 49.4%, difference, 9.6 pp [CI, 9.2 to 10.1 pp]). Differences between hospitals explained 7.3 pp [CI, 6.7 to 7.9 pp] of the variation in follow-up for AMI and 7.7 pp [CI, 7.2 to 8.1 pp]) for HF.<br />Limitation: Generalizability to other payers.<br />Conclusion: Equity-informed policy and health system strategies are needed to further reduce gaps in follow-up care for patients with AMI and patients with HF.<br />Primary Funding Source: National Institute on Aging.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M23-3475.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1539-3704
Volume :
177
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of internal medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39102715
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-3475