Back to Search Start Over

Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation with stenting versus stenting alone in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors :
Ramai D
Maida M
Smith ER
Wang Y
Spadaccini M
Previtera M
Chandan S
Huang Y
Tokmak S
Bhandari P
DuBroff J
Ko C
Morris JD
Marasco G
Crinó SF
Facciorusso A
Mangiavillano B
Khashab MA
Source :
Endoscopy [Endoscopy] 2024 Nov 06. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 06.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background: Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a palliative treatment for patients suffering from malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of RFA on stent patency, patient survival, and adverse events.<br />Methods: Major databases were searched through December 2023 for patients who had undergone stenting with or without RFA for extrahepatic MBO. A random-effects model was used for analysis, with results expressed as relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95%CIs.<br />Results: Nine RCTs involving 750 subjects with MBO (374 RFA plus stent vs. 376 stent only) were included. Meta-analysis revealed similar risks of stent patency at 3 months (RR 1.01, 95%CI 0.92-1.11; I <superscript>2</superscript> = 4%) for RFA plus stenting vs. stent only. Meta-analysis showed improved survival at 6 months (RR 0.84, 95%CI 0.73-0.96; I <superscript>2</superscript> = 21%; P = 0.01) for RFA plus stenting vs. stent only. Subgroup analysis comparing plastic vs. uncovered metal stents showed that stent patency was unaffected at 3 months (RR 1.06, 95%CI 0.91-1.23; I <superscript>2</superscript> = 17%). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with cholangiocarcinoma experienced an overall survival benefit with RFA plus stenting vs. stenting alone ( P < 0.001); however, stent patency remained unaffected ( P = 0.08). An increased incidence of cholecystitis was noted with RFA plus stenting vs. stenting alone (5.1% [95%CI 3.1%-7.8%] vs. 0.3% [95%CI 0.01%-1.5%], respectively).<br />Conclusion: Combining endoluminal RFA and stenting may improve overall survival in patients with MBO. RFA did not significantly impact stent patency.<br />Competing Interests: S.F. Crinò has received a grant from Steris Endoscopy. B. Mangiavillano has received lecture fees from Taewoong. M. Khashab is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Olympus, Pentax, GI Supply, and Apollo; he receives research support from Boston Scientific and royalties from Elsevier and UpToDate. D. Ramai, M. Maida, E.R. Smith, Y. Wang, M. Spadaccini, M. Previtera, S. Chandan, Y. Huang, S. Tokmak, P. Bhandari, J. Dubroff, C. Ko, J.D. Morris, G. Marasco, and A. Facciorusso declare that they have no conflict of interest.<br /> (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1438-8812
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39094769
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2378-9533