Back to Search Start Over

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical benefits and adverse reactions of anti-fibrotics in non-IPF progressive fibrosing ILD.

Authors :
Chong WH
Agrawal D
Tan ZY
Venkateswaran S
Tan AYY
Tan CY
Ling NCA
Tay NSWT
Source :
Heart & lung : the journal of critical care [Heart Lung] 2024 Nov-Dec; Vol. 68, pp. 242-253. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 31.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Anti-fibrotics can reduce restrictive impairment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, its effectiveness in non-IPF progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (non-IPF PF-ILD) remains uncertain.<br />Objective: We assess the efficacy and safety of anti-fibrotics pirfenidone and nintedanib versus placebo among non-IPF PF-ILD adult patients.<br />Methods: Meta-analysis was performed using PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). At respective centers, non-IPF PF-ILD was defined as clinical and radiological findings inconsistent with IPF and greater than 5 % forced vital capacity (FVC) decline, worsening radiological fibrosis or respiratory symptoms.<br />Results: Among seven RCTs involving 1,816 non-IPF PF-ILD patients, anti-fibrotics significantly reduced decline in FVC from baseline in milliliters (MD -66.80milliliters; P < 0.01) and percent predicted (MD -1.80 %; P < 0.01) compared to placebo. However, severity of FVC decline was less than 10 % (P = 0.33) in both groups. No significant difference in the decline of 6MWD from baseline in meters (P = 0.19) while on anti-fibrotics, although those on pirfenidone had less decline in 6MWD (MD -25.12 m; P < 0.01) versus placebo. The rates of all-cause mortality (P = 0.34), all-cause hospitalization (P = 0.44), and hospitalization for respiratory etiology (P = 0.06) were comparable in both groups. Adverse events of nausea/vomiting (54.2 % vs. 20.3 %; P < 0.01), diarrhea (65.2 % vs. 27.6 %; P = 0.02), anorexia/weight loss (23.0 % vs. 7.7 %; P < 0.01), neurological disorders (20.8 % vs. 12.6 %; P < 0.01), and events requiring therapy discontinuation were higher (18.4 % vs. 9.9 %; P < 0.01) in the anti-fibrotic group. Other adverse events of skin (P = 0.18) and respiratory disorders (P = 0.20) were equal.<br />Conclusion: The advent of anti-fibrotics offers alternative treatment to reduce lung function decline.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We declare no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-3288
Volume :
68
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Heart & lung : the journal of critical care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39089077
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.07.010