Back to Search Start Over

Carbapenem Versus Non-carbapenem Therapy in Hematology Patients: Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Positive Enterobacteriaceae Colonization Impact.

Authors :
Berk H
Oztoprak N
Kizilates F
Kurtoğlu E
Seremet Keskin A
Source :
Cureus [Cureus] 2024 Jul 01; Vol. 16 (7), pp. e63570. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 01 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriacea (ESBL-E) infections are a major source of mortality and morbidity in patients with hematologic cancers. One of the most significant risk factors for bacterial illness is prior colonization with resistant germs. Empiric usage of carbapenems is recommended for the treatment of infections in patients with a positive colonization history.<br />Objectives: We aimed to determine the outcome of empirical carbapenem (de-escalation) versus non-carbapenem (escalation) therapy in adult hematology patients who have rectal extended-spectrum beta-lactamase positive ESBL-E colonization.<br />Methods: Two hundred three rectal swab cultures were collected from 130 patients, admission or during hospitalization between June 2014 and May 2015. Patients were followed till January 2016 for future infections due to ESBL-E. Empirical antibiotic treatment was started according to the patient's medical condition without consideration of previous colonization status. Stable patients received empirical escalation therapy. All-cause and early mortality of infections are analyzed.<br />Results: Seventy-three (36%) swabs were positive for ESBL-E. Patients with rectal ESBL-E colonization were defined as cases; patients without colonization were defined as controls. Prospective infection due to ESBL-E in the case and control group was 6.8% and 2.3%, respectively. No statistically significant relation was found between colonization and prospective infection due to ESBL-E (p=0.110). There was no all-cause or early mortality in prospective infections with ESBL-E. Among case patients, one patient each died from all-cause mortality in the escalation (n=55) and de-escalation (n=3) group. The all-cause mortality in the antibiotic switch group (n=30) was eight, including five patients in the early mortality group although the bacteriologic agents were susceptible to the given antibiotics.<br />Conclusion: In our institution, rectal colonization with ESBL-E was high, but contracting an infection due to ESBL-E was surprisingly low. Colonization with ESBL-E may not necessarily end with an infection in some situations. In stable patients, disregarding colonization features before empirical therapy did not seem to be inappropriate.<br />Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Antalya Training and Research Hospital Ethics Committee issued approval 44-17. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.<br /> (Copyright © 2024, Berk et al.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2168-8184
Volume :
16
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cureus
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39087172
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.63570