Back to Search Start Over

The Use of a Handheld Ultrasound Device to Guide the Axillary Vein Access during Pacemaker and Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation. A Feasibility Study.

Authors :
Sassone B
Simeti G
Virzì S
Pasanisi G
Muser D
Source :
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine [Rev Cardiovasc Med] 2022 Jul 20; Vol. 23 (8), pp. 258. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 20 (Print Publication: 2022).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Although ultrasound guidance for axillary vein (AV) access (USGAVA) has been described as a reliable technique for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation, no data is available on the use of handheld ultrasound devices (HUD) in such a setting.<br />Objective: We investigated the feasibility of using a HUD for USGAVA in patients referred to our Institution for CIED implantation.<br />Methods: The procedure details of 80 consecutive patients undergoing USGAVA (Group-1) from June 2020 to June 2021 were prospectively collected and compared to those of an age and sex-matched cohort of 91 patients (Group-2) who had undergone AV access with the traditional venipuncture guided by fluoroscopic landmarks.<br />Results: The two groups were comparable for the success rate of venous access (92.5% versus 93.4%, p = 0.82), complication rate (1.3% versus 0.9%, p = 1.0), and procedure time (71 ± 32 min versus 70 ± 29 min, p = 0.9). However, Group-2 had a longer X-ray exposure time (7.6 ± 8.4 min versus 5.7 ± 7.3 min, p = 0.03). In Group-1, the univariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the AV diameter was associated with successful USGAVA (odds ratio = 3.34, 95% confidence interval 1.47-7.59, p < 0.01), with a 3-fold increase of probability of success per each 1 mm increase in the AV diameter.<br />Conclusions: USGAVA using a HUD for CIED implantation is a feasible, effective, and safe technique; moreover, it saves X-ray exposure time without lengthening the implant procedure time.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Daniele Muser was serving as Guest Editor of this journal. We declare that Daniele Muser had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Jerome L. Fleg.<br /> (Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1530-6550
Volume :
23
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39076618
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2308258