Back to Search Start Over

Automating Linear and Angular Measurements for the Hip and Knee After Computed Tomography: Validation of a Three-Stage Deep Learning and Computer Vision-Based Pipeline for Pathoanatomic Assessment.

Authors :
Vidhani FR
Woo JJ
Zhang YB
Olsen RJ
Ramkumar PN
Source :
Arthroplasty today [Arthroplast Today] 2024 May 11; Vol. 27, pp. 101394. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 11 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Variability in the bony morphology of pathologic hips/knees is a challenge in automating preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan measurements. With the increasing prevalence of CT for advanced preoperative planning, processing this data represents a critical bottleneck in presurgical planning, research, and development. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a reproducible and scalable methodology for analyzing CT-based anatomy to process hip and knee anatomy for perioperative planning and execution.<br />Methods: One hundred patients with preoperative CT scans undergoing total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were processed. A two-step deep learning pipeline of classification and segmentation models was developed that identifies landmark images and then generates contour representations. We utilized an open-source computer vision library to compute measurements. Classification models were assessed by accuracy, precision, and recall. Segmentation models were evaluated using dice and mean Intersection over Union (IOU) metrics. Contour measurements were compared against manual measurements to validate posterior condylar axis angle, sulcus angle, trochlear groove-tibial tuberosity distance, acetabular anteversion, and femoral version.<br />Results: Classifiers identified landmark images with accuracy of 0.91 and 0.88 for hip and knee models, respectively. Segmentation models demonstrated mean IOU scores above 0.95 with the highest dice coefficient of 0.957 [0.954-0.961] (UNet3+) and the highest mean IOU of 0.965 [0.961-0.969] (Attention U-Net). There were no statistically significant differences for the measurements taken automatically vs manually ( P > 0.05). Average time for the pipeline to preprocess (48.65 +/- 4.41 sec), classify/retrieve landmark images (8.36 +/- 3.40 sec), segment images (<1 sec), and obtain measurements was 2.58 (+/- 1.92) minutes.<br />Conclusions: A fully automated three-stage deep learning and computer vision-based pipeline of classification and segmentation models accurately localized, segmented, and measured landmark hip and knee images for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Incorporation of clinical parameters, like patient-reported outcome measures and instability risk, will be important considerations alongside anatomic parameters.<br /> (© 2024 The Authors.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2352-3441
Volume :
27
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Arthroplasty today
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39071819
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2024.101394