Back to Search Start Over

Intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy for oral cancer: Superiority of intensity-modulated radiation therapy over three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.

Authors :
Ito M
Hayashi T
Takeuchi A
Abe S
Adachi S
Oshima Y
Kazaoka Y
Suzuki K
Source :
Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery [J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg] 2024 Oct; Vol. 125 (5S2), pp. 101981. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 25.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the superiority of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) over three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in patients who underwent intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy for oral cancer.<br />Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with locally advanced oral cancer curatively treated with intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy at a single institution between 2010 and 2021. All patients treated after May 2015 underwent IMRT. Docetaxel (12 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> /week) and nedaplatin (5 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> /day) were administered through a shallow temporal artery using a catheter.<br />Results: In total, 143 patients (IMRT: 71; 3DCRT: 72) were included in this study. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 75.7 % and 59.8 %, respectively, with no significant differences between the irradiation methods. In multivariate analysis, cervical lymph node metastasis (LNM) was the only significant poor prognostic factor contributing to OS, PFS, locoregional control (LRC), and local control (LC). In multivariate subgroup analysis of LNM cases (n = 90), IMRT contributed to favorable LRC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.4, P = 0.01) and LC (HR=0.4, P = 0.006). There was no difference in the incidence of grade ≥2 osteonecrosis of the jaw (4.2 % vs. 12.5 %, P = 0.13), xerostomia (75 % vs. 82 %, P = 0.316), or dysgeusia (80 % vs. 82 %, P = 0.834) between the IMRT and 3DCRT groups. However, the rates of xerostomia at 6 months and dysgeusia at 3 months were lower in the IMRT group (both P < 0.001).<br />Conclusion: IMRT neither improved patient survival nor significantly reduced the incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw. However, it demonstrated favorable LRC and LC in patients with LNM, suggesting an advantage in early recovery from xerostomia and dysgeusia.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2468-7855
Volume :
125
Issue :
5S2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39067639
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101981