Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation induces functional deficits in norepinephrinergic neurotransmission in a Parkinson's disease model.

Background: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is a successful treatment option in Parkinson's disease (PD) for different motor and non-motor symptoms, but has been linked to postoperative cognitive impairment.
Aim: Since both dopaminergic and norepinephrinergic neurotransmissions play important roles in symptom development, we analysed STN-DBS effects on dopamine and norepinephrine availability in different brain regions and morphological alterations of catecholaminergic neurons in the 6-hydroxydopamine PD rat model.
Methods: We applied one week of continuous unilateral STN-DBS or sham stimulation, respectively, in groups of healthy and 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats to quantify dopamine and norepinephrine contents in the striatum, olfactory bulb and dentate gyrus. In addition, we analysed dopaminergic cell counts in the substantia nigra pars compacta and area tegmentalis ventralis and norepinephrinergic neurons in the locus coeruleus after one and six weeks of STN-DBS.
Results: In 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned animals, one week of STN-DBS did not alter dopamine levels, while striatal norepinephrine levels were decreased. However, neither one nor six weeks of STN-DBS altered dopaminergic neuron numbers in the midbrain or norepinephrinergic neuron counts in the locus coeruleus. Dopaminergic fibre density in the dorsal and ventral striatum also remained unchanged after six weeks of STN-DBS. In healthy animals, one week of STN-DBS resulted in increased dopamine levels in the olfactory bulb and decreased contents in the dentate gyrus, but had no effects on norepinephrine availability.
Conclusions: STN-DBS modulates striatal norepinephrinergic neurotransmission in a PD rat model. Additional behavioural studies are required to investigate the functional impact of this finding.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)