Back to Search Start Over

15-Gene Expression Profile and PRAME as Integrated Prognostic Test for Uveal Melanoma: First Report of Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study No. 2 (COOG2.1).

Authors :
Harbour JW
Correa ZM
Schefler AC
Mruthyunjaya P
Materin MA
Aaberg TA Jr
Skalet AH
Reichstein DA
Weis E
Kim IK
Fuller TS
Demirci H
Piggott KD
Williams BK
Shildkrot E
Capone A Jr
Oliver SC
Walter SD
Mason J 3rd
Char DH
Altaweel M
Wells JR
Duker JS
Hovland PG
Gombos DS
Tsai T
Javid C
Marr BP
Gao A
Decatur CL
Dollar JJ
Kurtenbach S
Zhang S
Source :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2024 Oct; Vol. 42 (28), pp. 3319-3329. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 25.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

PURPOSEValidated and accurate prognostic testing is critical for precision medicine in uveal melanoma (UM). Our aims were to (1) prospectively validate an integrated prognostic classifier combining a 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) and PRAME RNA expression and (2) identify clinical variables that enhance the prognostic accuracy of the 15-GEP/ PRAME classifier.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis study included 1,577 patients with UM of the choroid and/or ciliary body who were enrolled in the Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study Number 2 (COOG2) and prospectively monitored across 26 North American centers. Test results for 15-GEP (class 1 or class 2) and PRAME expression status (negative or positive) were available for all patients. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival (MFS).RESULTS15-GEP was class 1 in 1,082 (68.6%) and class 2 in 495 (31.4%) patients. PRAME status was negative in 1,106 (70.1%) and positive in 471 (29.9%) patients. Five-year MFS was 95.6% (95% CI, 93.9 to 97.4) for class 1/ PRAME (-), 80.6% (95% CI, 73.9 to 87.9) for class 1/ PRAME (+), 58.3% (95% CI, 51.1 to 66.4) for class 2/ PRAME (-), and 44.8% (95% CI, 37.9 to 52.8) for class 2/ PRAME (+). By multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, 15-GEP was the most important independent predictor of MFS (hazard ratio [HR], 5.95 [95% CI, 4.43 to 7.99]; P < .001), followed by PRAME status (HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.42 to 2.33]; P < .001). The only clinical variable demonstrating additional prognostic value was tumor diameter.CONCLUSIONIn the largest prospective multicenter prognostic biomarker study performed to date in UM to our knowledge, the COOG2 study validated the superior prognostic accuracy of the integrated 15-GEP/ PRAME classifier over 15-GEP alone and clinical prognostic variables. Tumor diameter was found to be the only clinical variable to provide additional prognostic information. This prognostic classifier provides an advanced resource for risk-adjusted metastatic surveillance and adjuvant trial stratification in patients with UM.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-7755
Volume :
42
Issue :
28
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39052972
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00447