Evaluation of jigsaw collaborative learning strategy on students' learning of clinical pharmacokinetics of special populations.

Objectives: To evaluate the learning gain and students' perceptions towards Jigsaw collaborative learning in comparison with lectures in learning about pharmacokinetic changes in special populations.
Methods: Undergraduates learn about A-D-M-E of specific populations via Jigsaw collaborative learning and didactic lectures. Pre- and post-lesson quizzes were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching method in terms of knowledge gain. Surveys comprising Likert scale statements and open-ended questions were conducted to elucidate students' perception towards the teaching methods.
Results: From a class of 192 students, 118 (62%) and 110 (57%) students completed the pre- and post-lecture quizzes, respectively, while 176 (92%) and 168 (88%) students completed the pre- and post-Home Group discussion of Jigsaw quizzes, respectively. There was an improvement of 22.2% and 14.3% in median percentage quiz scores for the lecture and Jigsaw method respectively. Most students agreed that they have learned (54-60%) and collaborated (78-89%) through the Jigsaw method and rated Jigsaw as useful for their learning (54%). Open-ended survey responses offered a mixed conclusion where the didactic lecture was perceived to be as, or more effective than the Jigsaw method.
Conclusion: Learning gains were observed through the Jigsaw collaborative learning method which relied solely on peer-teaching, despite students perceiving it to be not as effective as lecture. The method provided opportunities for active and peer-learning. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects of this teaching method.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)