Back to Search Start Over

Standardizing Retrospective Observational Research in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Expert Panel Guidelines from ITSCC.

Authors :
Cheraghlou S
Stevenson ML
Christensen SR
Bordeaux JS
Walker JL
Srivastava D
Ferrándiz-Pulido C
Bibee KP
Carter JB
Samie FH
Patel VA
Carroll BT
Vidimos AT
Baum CL
Leitenberger JJ
Jambusaria-Pahlajani A
Ruiz ES
Carucci JA
Carr DR
Shahwan KT
Source :
JAMA dermatology [JAMA Dermatol] 2024 Sep 01; Vol. 160 (9), pp. 989-992.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Importance: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most common malignant disease in the US. Although it typically carries a good prognosis, a subset of CSCCs are highly aggressive, carrying regional and distant metastatic potential. Due to its high incidence, this aggressive subset is responsible for considerable mortality, with an overall annual mortality estimated to equal or even surpass melanoma. Despite this morbidity, CSCC is excluded from national cancer registries, making it difficult to study its epidemiology and outcomes. Therefore, the bulk of the CSCC literature is composed of single-center and multi-institutional retrospective cohort analyses. Given variations in reporting measures and analyses in these studies, interpretability between studies and the ability to pool results are limited.<br />Objective: To define standardized reporting measures for retrospective CSCC studies.<br />Findings: An expert panel was convened to determine standardized guidelines for recording and analyzing retrospective CSCC data. A total of 13 dermatologists and dermatologic surgeons with more than 5 years of posttraining experience and considerable experience with performing CSCC outcomes research were recruited to the panel. Consensus recommendations were achieved for CSCC retrospective study reporting measures, definitions, and analyses.<br />Conclusions and Relevance: The recommendations in this report present the potential to standardize future CSCC retrospective studies. With such standardization, future work may have greater interstudy interpretability and allow for pooled analyses.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2168-6084
Volume :
160
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JAMA dermatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39046711
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2242