Reliability assessment of distal occlusion eTICI scoring.

Background: The eThrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) score has been validated in proximal large artery occlusion (pLAOs). Despite the growing number of distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) mechanical thrombectomies (MT) and the widespread utilization of the eTICI scoring system, its reliability and standardization for more distal occlusions have not been validated. We aim to evaluate the interrater reliability of eTICI scores in primary DMVOs.
Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database for consecutive patients with pLAO and DMVO MT at a single comprehensive stroke center from 2015 to 2022. Two fellowship-trained neurointerventionalists blindly/independently assessed digital subtraction angiograms for final eTICI, followed by consensus reads for discrepancies.
Results: 59 DMVO of 2248 thrombectomies [M3:29(50%)/M4:1(2%)/A1:3(5%)/A2:12(22%)/A3: 5(9%)/P1:7(12%)/P2:1(2%)] and 124 pLAOs of 308 thrombectomies [i-ICA:13(11%)/MCA-M1: 111(90%)] were included. The distribution of final eTICI scores was comparable between pLAO vs DMVOs (p = 0.82). The pLAO final eTICI score assessment between two readers demonstrated moderate reliability with a kappa0.77 (95%CI: 0.67-0.88), while the DMVO eTICI score assessment exhibited almost-perfect agreement with kappa 0.94 (95%CI: 0.90-0.99). The agreement between the consensus read and the original report in DMVOs was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.71-1.00) while for pLAO it was 0.83(95% CI: 0.76-0.90). The performance of eTICI was comparable amongst different DMVO territories as well as for distal vs. very distal occlusions.
Conclusion: eTICI score exhibited comparable performance for DMVO as compared to pLAO strokes. Further studies investigating DMVO eTICI grading and clinical outcomes are warranted.
Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.