In vitro model to evaluate effect of acidic pepsin on vocal fold barrier function.

The pathophysiology of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and its impact on the vocal fold is not well understood, but may involve acid damage to vocal fold barrier functions. Two different components encompass vocal fold barrier function: the mucus barrier and tight junctions. Mucus retained on epithelial microprojections protects the inside of the vocal fold by neutralizing acidic damage. Tight junctions control permeability between cells. Here we developed an in vitro experimental system to evaluate acidic injury and repair of vocal fold barrier functions. We first established an in vitro model of rat vocal fold epithelium that could survive at least one week after barrier function maturation. The model enabled repeated evaluation of the course of vocal fold repair processes. Then, an injury experiment was conducted in which vocal fold cells were exposed to a 5-min treatment with acidic pepsin that injured tight junctions and cell surface microprojections. Both of them healed within one day of injury. Comparing vocal fold cells treated with acid alone with cells treated with acidic pepsin showed that acidic pepsin had a stronger effect on intercellular permeability than acid alone, whereas pepsin had little effect on microprojections. This result suggests that the proteolytic action of pepsin has a larger effect on protein-based tight junctions than on phospholipids in microprojections. This experimental system could contribute to a better understanding of vocal fold repair processes after chemical or physical injuries, as well as voice problems due to LPR pathogenesis.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Masanobu Mizuta, Ichiro Tateya reports financial support was provided by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)