Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy of the FIFA cooling break heat policy during an intermittent treadmill football simulation in hot conditions in trained males.

Authors :
Brown HA
Chalmers S
Topham TH
Clark B
Jowett A
Meyer T
Jay O
Périard JD
Source :
British journal of sports medicine [Br J Sports Med] 2024 Sep 09; Vol. 58 (18), pp. 1044-1051. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 09.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) cooling break policy against alternative cooling configurations in attenuating thermal strain during simulated football in the heat.<br />Methods: 12 males (age: 27±6 years, V̇O <subscript>2peak</subscript> : 61±7 mL/kg/min) completed five 90 min intermittent treadmill football match simulations in 40°C and 41% relative humidity (32°C wet-bulb globe temperature) with different cooling configurations: regular match without cooling breaks (REG), 3 min breaks without cooling (BRK <subscript>no-cool</subscript> ), 3 min breaks with cooling (BRK <subscript>cool</subscript> : current FIFA policy; chilled fluid ingestion and ice towel across neck and shoulders), 5 min extended half-time without cooling breaks (ExtHT <subscript>only</subscript> ) and 3 min cooling breaks with 5 min ExtHT (ExtHT <subscript>cool</subscript> ). Rectal temperature (T <subscript>re</subscript> ), heart rate, whole-body sweat rate (WBSR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. Data are presented as mean (95% CIs).<br />Results: Final T <subscript>re</subscript> was lower in BRK <subscript>no-cool</subscript> (0.20°C (0.01, 0.39), p=0.038), BRK <subscript>cool</subscript> (0.39°C (0.21, 0.57), p<0.001) and ExtHT <subscript>cool</subscript> (0.40°C (0.22, 0.58), p<0.001) than REG (39.1°C (38.8, 39.3)). Mean T <subscript>re</subscript> was lower in ExtHT <subscript>cool</subscript> (38.2°C (38.0, 38.4)) than BRK <subscript>cool</subscript> (38.3°C (38.1, 38.5), p=0.018), BRK <subscript>no-cool</subscript> and ExtHT <subscript>only</subscript> (38.4°C (38.2, 38.6), p<0.001) and REG (38.5°C (38.3, 38.7), p<0.001). Mean heart rate was lower during BRK <subscript>cool</subscript> (6 beats/min (4, 7), p<0.001) and ExtHT <subscript>cool</subscript> (7 beats/min (6, 8), p<0.001) compared with REG. WBSR was comparable across trials (p ≥ 0.07) and RPE was attenuated during BRK <subscript>cool</subscript> (0.4 (0.1, 0.7), p=0.004) and ExtHT <subscript>cool</subscript> (0.5 (0.2, 0.7), p=0.002), compared with REG.<br />Conclusion: BRK <subscript>cool</subscript> and ExtHT <subscript>cool</subscript> attenuated thermal, cardiovascular and perceptual strain during a simulated football match in the heat. Additional strategies may be required in field settings or under harsher conditions.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1473-0480
Volume :
58
Issue :
18
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
British journal of sports medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39029949
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108131