Back to Search Start Over

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a 'Termination of Resuscitation' protocol for the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors :
Nazeha N
Mao DR
Hong D
Shahidah N
Chua ISY
Ng YY
Leong BSH
Tiah L
Chia MYC
Ng WM
Doctor NE
Ong MEH
Graves N
Source :
Resuscitation [Resuscitation] 2024 Sep; Vol. 202, pp. 110323. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 17.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Historically in Singapore, all out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) were transported to hospital for pronouncement of death. A 'Termination of Resuscitation' (TOR) protocol, implemented from 2019 onwards, enables emergency responders to pronounce death at-scene in Singapore. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the TOR protocol for OHCA management.<br />Methods: Adopting a healthcare provider's perspective, a Markov model was developed to evaluate three competing options: No TOR, Observed TOR reflecting existing practice, and Full TOR if TOR is exercised fully. The model had a cycle duration of 30 days after the initial state of having a cardiac arrest, and was evaluated over a 10-year time horizon. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to account for uncertainties. The costs per quality adjusted life years (QALY) was calculated.<br />Results: A total of 3,695 OHCA cases eligible for the TOR protocol were analysed; mean age of 73.0 ± 15.5 years. For every 10,000 hypothetical patients, Observed TOR and Full TOR had more deaths by approximately 19 and 31 patients, respectively, compared to No TOR. Full TOR had the least costs and QALYs at $19,633,369 (95% Uncertainty Interval (UI) 19,469,973 to 19,796,764) and 0 QALYs. If TOR is exercised for every eligible case, it could expect to save approximately $400,440 per QALY loss compared to No TOR, and $821,151 per QALY loss compared to Observed TOR.<br />Conclusion: The application of the TOR protocol for the management of OHCA was found to be cost-effective within acceptable willingness-to-pay thresholds, providing some justification for sustainable adoption.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-1570
Volume :
202
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Resuscitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39029582
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110323