Clinical benefits of combining oral cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents with radiotherapy in patients with T2N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma based on the reports of the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan.

Background: T2N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) typically responds well to radiotherapy (RT); however, achieving local control remains challenging. In cases of RT failure, total laryngectomy may be necessary. Improved local control and preservation of the larynx directly enhances patients' quality of life. Our retrospective analysis using the Japan Head and Neck Cancer Registry (JHNCR) aimed to compare the clinical benefits of RT and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with T2N0 glottic SCC.
Methods: Using data from the JHNCR (2011-2015), we included 1,231 patients with T2N0 glottic SCC. Among them, 346 received curative RT and 425 underwent curative CRT. The CRT group was further divided into the oral CRT (Oral CRT, N=120) and intravenous CRT (DIV CRT, N=305) groups. This study assessed local control rate (LCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis was used to adjust for patient characteristics.
Results: After matching, 105 pairs compared RT with Oral CRT, and 224 pairs compared RT with DIV CRT. The variables were well-balanced in the matched populations. In the matched populations, the Oral CRT group had significantly better 5-year LCR and PFS than the RT group (LCR, 89.4 % vs. 80.6 %, P=0.043; and PFS, 85.5 % vs. 72.3 %, P=0.025, respectively), while the DIV RT group had significantly better 5-year PFS than the RT group (80.1 % vs. 68.6 %, P=0.026).
Conclusions: The clinical benefits of better local and disease controls were observed when oral chemotherapy was added to RT in patients with T2N0 glottic SCC. Thus, the significance of adding oral chemotherapeutic agents to RT in the treatment of T2N0 glottic SCC requires further prospective investigation.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)