Back to Search
Start Over
Accuracy, thoroughness, and quality of outpatient primary care documentation in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
- Source :
-
BMC primary care [BMC Prim Care] 2024 Jul 18; Vol. 25 (1), pp. 262. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 18. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) can accelerate documentation and may enhance details of notes, or complicate documentation and introduce errors. Comprehensive assessment of documentation quality requires comparing documentation to what transpires during the clinical encounter itself. We assessed outpatient primary care notes and corresponding recorded encounters to determine accuracy, thoroughness, and several additional key measures of documentation quality.<br />Methods: Patients and primary care clinicians across five midwestern primary care clinics of the US Department of Veterans Affairs were recruited into a prospective observational study. Clinical encounters were video-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9) added to other measures, reviewers scored quality of the documentation by comparing transcripts to corresponding encounter notes. PDQI-9 items were scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher quality.<br />Results: Encounters (Nā=ā49) among 11 clinicians were analyzed. Most issues that patients initiated in discussion were omitted from notes, and nearly half of notes referred to information or observations that could not be verified. Four notes lacked concluding assessments and plans; nine lacked information about when patients should return. Except for thoroughness, PDQI-9 items that were assessed achieved quality scores exceeding 4 of 5 points.<br />Conclusions: Among outpatient primary care electronic records examined, most issues that patients initiated in discussion were absent from notes, and nearly half of notes referred to information or observations absent from transcripts. EHRs may contribute to certain kinds of errors. Approaches to improving documentation should consider the roles of the EHR, patient, and clinician together.<br /> (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2731-4553
- Volume :
- 25
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- BMC primary care
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39026167
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02501-6