Back to Search
Start Over
Estimates of late Early Cretaceous atmospheric CO 2 from Mongolia based on stomatal and isotopic analysis of Pseudotorellia.
- Source :
-
American journal of botany [Am J Bot] 2024 Jul; Vol. 111 (7), pp. e16376. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 17. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Premise: The Aptian-Albian (121.4-100.5 Ma) was a greenhouse period with global temperatures estimated as 10-15°C warmer than pre-industrial conditions, so it is surprising that the most reliable CO <subscript>2</subscript> estimates from this time are <1400 ppm. This low CO <subscript>2</subscript> during a warm period implies a very high Earth-system sensitivity in the range of 6 to 9°C per CO <subscript>2</subscript> doubling between the Aptian-Albian and today.<br />Methods: We applied a well-vetted paleo-CO <subscript>2</subscript> proxy based on leaf gas-exchange principles (Franks model) to two Pseudotorellia species from three stratigraphically similar samples at the Tevshiin Govi lignite mine in central Mongolia (~119.7-100.5 Ma).<br />Results: Our median estimated CO <subscript>2</subscript> concentration from the three respective samples was 2132, 2405, and 2770 ppm. The primary reason for the high estimated CO <subscript>2</subscript> but with relatively large uncertainties is the very low stomatal density in both species, where small variations propagate to large changes in estimated CO <subscript>2</subscript> . Indeed, we found that at least 15 leaves are required before the aggregate estimated CO <subscript>2</subscript> approaches that of the full data set.<br />Conclusions: Our three CO <subscript>2</subscript> estimates all exceeded 2000 ppm, translating to an Earth-system sensitivity (~3-5°C/CO <subscript>2</subscript> doubling) that is more in keeping with the current understanding of the long-term climate system. Because of our large sample size, the directly measured inputs did not contribute much to the overall uncertainty in estimated CO <subscript>2</subscript> ; instead, the inferred inputs were responsible for most of the overall uncertainty and thus should be scrutinized for their value choices.<br /> (© 2024 Botanical Society of America.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1537-2197
- Volume :
- 111
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- American journal of botany
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39020509
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.16376