Back to Search Start Over

International differences in the selection and outcome of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy: A transatlantic analysis.

Authors :
Johansen KU
Augustinus S
Wellner UF
Andersson B
Beane JD
Björnsson B
Busch OR
Davis CH
Ghadimi M
Gleeson EM
de Graaf N
Koerkamp BG
Pitt HA
van Santvoort HC
Tingstedt B
Uhl W
Werner J
Williamsson C
Besselink MG
Keck T
Source :
Surgery [Surgery] 2024 Oct; Vol. 176 (4), pp. 1198-1206. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 16.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy have been confirmed by randomized trials, but current patient selection and outcome of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy in large international cohorts is unknown. This study aimed to compare the use and outcome of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy in North America, the Netherlands, Germany, and Sweden.<br />Methods: All patients in the 4 Global Audits on Pancreatic Surgery Group (GAPASURG) registries who underwent minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy or open distal pancreatectomy during 2014-2020 were included.<br />Results: Overall, 20,158 distal pancreatectomies were included, of which 7,316 (36%) were minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies. Use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy varied from 29% to 54% among registries, of which 13% to 35% were performed robotically. Both the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and robotic surgery were the highest in the Netherlands. Patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy tended to have a younger age (Germany and Sweden), female sex (North America, Germany), higher body mass index (North America, the Netherlands, Germany), lower comorbidity classification (North America, Germany, Sweden), lower performance status (Germany), and lower rate of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (all). The minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy group had fewer vascular resections (all) and lower rates of severe complications and mortality (North America, Germany). In the multivariable regression analysis, country was associated with severe complications but not with 30-day mortality. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy was associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality compared with open distal pancreatectomy (odds ratio 1.633, 95% CI 1.159-2.300, P = .005).<br />Conclusions: Considerable disparities were seen in the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy among 4 transatlantic registries of pancreatic surgery. Overall, minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy was associated with decreased mortality as compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Differences in patient selection among countries could imply that countries are in different stages of the learning curve.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-7361
Volume :
176
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39019733
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.06.028