Association study between adiponectin gene variants, serum levels and the risk of type 2 diabetes in Tunisian women: Insights from BMI stratification.

Although prior studies have shown that adiponectin synthesis is genetically determined and that its levels influence susceptibility to T2D, the results in this regard have been inconsistent. This study aims, to investigate the relationship between adiponectin gene variants with the risk of developing T2D among Tunisian women and in relation to their BMI status. A cohort of 491 Tunisian T2D women and 373 non-diabetic subjects participated in the study. Nine ADIPOQ variants namely rs16861194, rs17300539, rs266729, rs822395, rs822396, rs2241766, rs1501299, rs2241767 and rs3774261 were selected and genotyped using the TaqMan® SNP genotyping assay. Fasting serum adiponectin levels were quantified using ELISA. The results showed that only the rs17300539 variant exhibited a significant association with the risk of T2D. However, upon considering T2D group stratification based on BMI (normal weight [18-24.99 Kg/m ² ], overweight [25-29.99 Kg/m ² ] and obese [30-34.99 Kg/m ² ]), the ADIPOQ rs2241766 variant emerged as a contributing risk factor for increased BMI in obese women with T2D. Linear regression analysis revealed that the minor allele (A), (GA) and (AA) genotypes of rs17300539 as well as the (G) allele and (GG) genotype of rs2241766 were significantly associated with hypoadiponectinemia in T2D subjects. Two haplotypes namely GGCAATGAA and AGCCGTGGA, were identified as conferring a higher risk of T2D with the GGCAATGAA haplotype also correlating with hypoadiponectinemia. Our study underscores the importance of the rs17300539 variant and the GGCAATGAA haplotype in the risk of T2D and hypoadiponectinemia. Additionally, the presence of the rs2241766 variant highlights its association with 'diabesity' and hypoadiponectinemia among Tunisian T2D women.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)