Combined deep learning and radiomics in pretreatment radiation esophagitis prediction for patients with esophageal cancer underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Purpose: To develop a combined radiomics and deep learning (DL) model in predicting radiation esophagitis (RE) of a grade ≥ 2 for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) based on computed tomography (CT) and radiation dose (RD) distribution images.
Materials and Methods: A total of 273 EC patients underwent VMAT were retrospectively reviewed and enrolled from two centers and divided into training (n = 152), internal validation (n = 66), and external validation (n = 55) cohorts, respectively. Radiomic and dosiomic features along with DL features using convolutional neural networks were extracted and screened from CT and RD images to predict RE. The performance of these models was evaluated and compared using the area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC).
Results: There were 5 and 10 radiomic and dosiomic features were screened, respectively. XGBoost achieved a best AUC of 0.703, 0.694 and 0.801, 0.729 with radiomic and dosiomic features in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. ResNet34 achieved a best prediction AUC of 0.642, 0.657 and 0.762, 0.737 for radiomics based DL model (DLR) and RD based DL model (DLD) in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. Combined model of DLD + Dosiomics + clinical factors achieved a best AUC of 0.913, 0.821 and 0.805 in the training, internal, and external validation cohorts, respectively.
Conclusion: Although the dose was not responsible for the prediction accuracy, the combination of various feature extraction methods was a factor in improving the RE prediction accuracy. Combining DLD with dosiomic features was promising in the pretreatment prediction of RE for EC patients underwent VMAT.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)