Back to Search
Start Over
Long-Term Survival and Reintervention Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Source :
-
Annals of vascular surgery [Ann Vasc Surg] 2024 Dec; Vol. 109, pp. 162-176. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 14. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) represents one of the most devastating scenarios of vascular trauma. Different management strategies are available with varying clinical outcomes. However, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the first-line option for most BTAI patients, mainly owing to its minimally invasive nature, yielding improved immediate results. This meta-analysis aims to investigate mortality, long-term survival, and reintervention following TEVAR in BTAI.<br />Material and Methods: A systematic review conducted a comprehensive literature search on multiple electronic databases using strict search terms. Twenty-seven studies met the set inclusion/exclusion criteria. A proportional meta-analysis of extracted data was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software, v.4.<br />Results: 1498 BTAI patients who underwent TEVAR were included. Using the SVS grading system, 2.6% of the population had Grade 1 injuries, 13.6% Grade 2, 62.2% Grade 3, 19.6% Grade 4, and 1.9% unspecific. All-cause mortality did not exceed 20% in all studies except one outlier with a 37% mortality rate. Using the random effects model, the pooled estimate of overall mortality was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.35-8.55%; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 70.6%). This was 91% (95% CI, 88.6-93.2; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 30.2%) at 6 months, 90.1% (95% CI, 86.7-92.3; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 53.6%) at 1 year, 89.2% (95% CI, 85.2-91.8; I2 = 62.3%) at 2 years, and 88.1% (95% CI, 83.3-90.9; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 69.6%) at 5 years. Moreover, the pooled estimate of reintervention was 6.4% (95% CI, 0.1-0.49%; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 81.7%).<br />Conclusions: Despite the high morbidity and mortality associated with BTAI, TEVAR has proven to be a safe and effective management strategy with favorable long-term survival and minimal need for reintervention. Nevertheless, diagnosis of BTAI requires a high index of suspicion with appropriate grading and prompt transfer to trauma centers with appropriate TEVAR facilities.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Time Factors
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Female
Male
Middle Aged
Adult
Aged
Postoperative Complications mortality
Postoperative Complications etiology
Risk Assessment
Young Adult
Adolescent
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
Endovascular Procedures mortality
Endovascular Procedures adverse effects
Wounds, Nonpenetrating surgery
Wounds, Nonpenetrating mortality
Wounds, Nonpenetrating diagnostic imaging
Aorta, Thoracic surgery
Aorta, Thoracic injuries
Aorta, Thoracic diagnostic imaging
Vascular System Injuries surgery
Vascular System Injuries mortality
Vascular System Injuries diagnostic imaging
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation mortality
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Thoracic Injuries surgery
Thoracic Injuries mortality
Thoracic Injuries diagnostic imaging
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1615-5947
- Volume :
- 109
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Annals of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39004278
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2024.04.029