Developmental 6:2 FTCA exposure impairs renal development in chicken embryos via IGF signaling.

6:2 fluorotelomer carboxylic acid (6:2 FTCA) is a perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) substitute, which is supposedly less accumulative and toxic than PFOA. However, 6:2 FTCA is structurally similar to PFOA, and there had already been reports about its toxicities comparable to PFOA. The aim of the current study is to assess potential effects of developmental exposure to 6:2 FTCA on the development of kidney in chicken embryo and to investigate underlying mechanism. Fertile chicken eggs were exposed to 1.25 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg doses of 6:2 FTCA, or 2 mg/kg PFOA, then incubated to hatch. Serum and kidney of hatchling chickens were collected. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (Cre) levels were measured with commercially available kits. Morphology of kidney was assessed with histopathology. To further reveal molecular mechanism of observed endpoints, IGF signaling molecules were assessed in the kidney samples with qRT-PCR, results indicated that IGFBP3 is a potentially crucial molecule. Lentiviruses overexpressing or silencing IGFBP3 were designed and applied to enhance/suppress the expression of IGFBP3 in developing chicken embryo for further verification of its role in the observed effects. Disrupted nephron formation, in the manifestation of decreased glomeruli number/area and increased serum BUN/Cre levels, was observed in the animals developmentally exposed to 6:2 FTCA. Correspondingly, IGF signaling molecules (IGF1, IGF1R and IGFBP3) were affected by 6:2 FTCA exposure. Meanwhile, overexpression of IGFBP3 effectively alleviated such changes, while silencing of IGFBP3 mimicked observed effects. In conclusion, developmental exposure to 6:2 FTCA is associated with disrupted chicken embryo renal development, in which IGFBP3 seems to be a remarkable contributor, suggesting potential health risks for human and other species. Further risk assessments and mechanistic works are necessary.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Qixiao Jiang reports financial support was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China. Yuxu Zhong reports financial support was provided by Logistics Scientific Research Plan. Junhua Yuan reports financial support was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)