Back to Search Start Over

A systematic review on the effectiveness of robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy.

Authors :
Triemstra L
den Boer RB
Rovers MM
Hazenberg CEVB
van Hillegersberg R
Grutters JPC
Ruurda JP
Source :
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association [Gastric Cancer] 2024 Sep; Vol. 27 (5), pp. 932-946. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 11.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) is increasingly used as a surgical approach for gastric cancer. This study assessed the effectiveness of RAMIG and studied which stages of the IDEAL-framework (1 = Idea, 2A = Development, 2B = Exploration, 3 = Assessment, 4 = Long-term follow-up) were followed.<br />Methods: The Cochrane Library, Embase, Pubmed, and Web of Science were searched for studies on RAMIG up to January 2023. Data collection included the IDEAL-stage, demographics, number of participants, and study design. For randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and long-term studies, data on intra-, postoperative, and oncologic outcomes, survival, and costs of RAMIG were collected and summarized.<br />Results: Of the 114 included studies, none reported the IDEAL-stage. After full-text reading, 18 (16%) studies were considered IDEAL-2A, 75 (66%) IDEAL-2B, 4 (4%) IDEAL-3, and 17 (15%) IDEAL-4. The IDEAL-stages were followed sequentially (2A-4), with IDEAL-2A studies still ongoing. IDEAL-3 RCTs showed lower overall complications (8.5-9.2% RAMIG versus 17.6-19.3% laparoscopic total/subtotal gastrectomy), equal 30-day mortality (0%), and equal length of hospital stay for RAMIG (mean 5.7-8.5 days RAMIG versus 6.4-8.2 days open/laparoscopic total/subtotal gastrectomy). Lymph node yield was similar across techniques, but RAMIG incurred significantly higher costs than laparoscopic total/subtotal gastrectomy ($13,423-15,262 versus $10,165-10,945). IDEAL-4 studies showed similar or improved overall/disease-free survival for RAMIG.<br />Conclusion: During worldwide RAMIG implementation, the IDEAL-framework was followed in sequential order. IDEAL-3 and 4 long-term studies showed that RAMIG is similar or even better to conventional surgery in terms of hospital stay, lymph node yield, and overall/disease-free survival. In addition, RAMIG showed reduced postoperative complication rates, despite higher costs.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1436-3305
Volume :
27
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38990413
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-024-01534-1