Back to Search Start Over

Differential regulation of belowground rhizospheric ecosystem by biological and chemical nitrogen supplies: implications for maize yield enhancement mechanisms.

Authors :
Zhang B
Nasar J
Dong S
Zhou X
Gao Q
Source :
Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) [Plant Biol (Stuttg)] 2024 Oct; Vol. 26 (6), pp. 1021-1032. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 10.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) content affects aboveground maize growth and nutrient absorption by altering the belowground rhizospheric ecosystem, impacting both yield and quality. However, the mechanisms through which different N supply methods (chemical and biological N supplies) regulate the belowground rhizospheric ecosystem to enhance maize yield remain unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a field experiment in northeast China, comprising three treatments: maize monocropping without N fertilizer application (MM), maize/alfalfa intercropping without N fertilizer application (BNF), and maize monocropping with N fertilizer application (CNS). The MM treatment represents the control, while the BNF treatment represents the biological N supply form, and CNS treatment represents the chemical N supply form. In the autumn of 2019, samples of maize and rhizospheric soil were collected to assess parameters including yield, rhizospheric soil characteristics, and microbial indicators. Both BNF and MM significantly increased maize yield and different yield components compared with MM, with no statistically significant difference in total yield between BNF and CNS. Furthermore, BNF significantly improved N by 12.61% and available N (AN) by 13.20% compared with MM. Furthermore, BNF treatment also significantly increased the Shannon index by 1.90%, while the CNS treatment significantly increased the Chao1 index by 28.1% and ACE index by 29.49%, with no significant difference between CNS and BNF. However, CNS had a more pronounced impact on structure of the rhizosphere soil bacterial community compared to BNF, inducing more significant fluctuations within the microbial network (modularity index and negative cohesion index). Regarding N transformation pathways predicted by bacterial functions, BNF significantly increased the N fixation pathway, while CNS significantly increased assimilatory nitrate reduction. In CNS, AN, NO <subscript>3</subscript> -N, NH <subscript>4</subscript> -N, assimilatory nitrate reduction, and community structure contributed significantly to maize yield, whereas in BNF, N fixation, community structure, community stability, NO <subscript>3</subscript> -N, and NH <subscript>4</subscript> -N played significant roles in enhancing maize yield. While CNS and BNF can achieve comparable maize yields in practical agricultural production, they have significantly different impacts on the belowground rhizosphere ecosystem, leading to different mechanisms of yield enhancement.<br /> (© 2024 Wiley‐VCH GmbH. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1438-8677
Volume :
26
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38985647
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13689