Traditional radiography versus computed tomography to assess reduced distal radius fractures.

Introduction: This study compares computed tomography (CT) with plain radiography in its ability to assess distal radius fracture (DRF) malalignment after closed reduction and cast immobilization.
Methods: Malalignment is defined as radiographic fracture alignment beyond threshold values according to the Dutch guideline encompassing angulation, inclination, positive ulnar variance and intra-articular step-off or gap. After identifying 96 patients with correct alignment on initial post-reduction radiographs, we re-assessed alignment on post-reduction CT scans.
Results: Significant discrepancies were found between radiographs and CT scans in all measurement parameters. Notably, intra-articular step-off and gap variations on CT scans led to the reclassification of the majority of cases from correct alignment to malalignment. CT scans showed malalignment in 53% of cases, of which 73% underwent surgery.
Conclusion: When there is doubt about post-reduction alignment based on radiograph imaging, additional CT scanning often reveals malalignment, primarily due to intra-articular incongruency.
Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval: Ethical approval to report this case/these cases was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (MEC-2020–0258). Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)