Percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion results in less perioperative opioid usage compared to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single institution, multi-surgeon retrospective study.

Background: Ultra-minimally invasive percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion (percLIF) has been demonstrated to further minimize tissue trauma and has been associated with improved clinical outcomes including decreased blood loss, post-operative pain and length of stay when compared to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery. A single-institution retrospective study was conducted to investigate whether 1-level percLIF is associated with decreased narcotic consumption compared to 1-level MIS-TLIF in the first 24-hour following surgery.
Methods: A retrospective study of patients undergoing either single-level percLIF or MIS-TLIF from January 2018 to December 2021. Opioid consumption in the 24-hour following surgery was converted into total morphine milligram equivalents (MME). The primary outcome used univariate and multivariate regression analysis to compare MME consumption between the MIS-TLIF and percLIF groups. Secondary outcome variables included, estimated blood loss, total intraoperative MME, MME at discharge, MME at 30 days post-op, exiting nerve root injury, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) visual analogue scale (VAS) score at handoff, time to first ambulation, distance ambulated post-operative day one and hospital length of stay.
Results: A total of 51 patients (21 percLIF vs. 30 MIS-TLIF) were included in the study. Univariate regression analysis revealed that on average patients who underwent percLIF had a 24-hour postoperative MME -50.8 mg (95% CI: -91.6, -10) lower than those who had MIS-TLIF (P=0.02). On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for sex and age, 24-hour postoperative MME closely failed to meet statistical significance (P=0.06) with an average of -40.8 mg (95% CI: -83.2, 1.6) MME in percLIF patients compared to MIS-TLIF. There was no statistically significant difference in MME between MIS-TLIF and percLIF at the time of discharge and at 30 days post-op.
Conclusions: In the setting of the current opioid epidemic in the United States and increased numbers of patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion, spine surgeons must continue to do their part helping reduce the need for opioid prescriptions for postoperative pain management. New "ultra-MIS" techniques such as percLIF allow surgeons to further decrease tissue trauma, which should lead to reduced need for post-operative narcotic requirements.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-23-132/coif). All authors report that the study was supported in part by Grant Number UL1TR002553 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), the grant does not directly support the work but they wish to acknowledge this support since the grant provides funding for the infrastructure in the BERD methods Core. T.W. has received consulting fees from Spineology. P.G. does teach and consult for DePuy spine; does consult and speak for Pacira Bioscience with respect to the use of liposomal bupivacaine in spine surgery; and has invested (<1%) in Restore3D and Medcura, neither of which make and products relevant to this study. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.
(2024 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.)