Back to Search
Start Over
Machine learning-based decision support model for selecting intra-arterial therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A national real-world evidence-based study.
- Source :
-
British journal of cancer [Br J Cancer] 2024 Sep; Vol. 131 (5), pp. 832-842. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 06. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Importance: Intra-arterial therapies(IATs) are promising options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Stratifying the prognostic risk before administering IAT is important for clinical decision-making and for designing future clinical trials.<br />Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning(ML)-based decision support model(MLDSM) for recommending IAT modalities for unresectable HCC.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: Between October 2014 and October 2022, a total of 2,959 patients with HCC who underwent initial IATs were enroled retrospectively from 13 tertiary hospitals. These patients were divided into the training cohort (n = 1700), validation cohort (n = 428), and test cohort (n = 200).<br />Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-two clinical variables were input, and five supervised ML algorithms, including eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Categorical Gradient Boosting (CatBoost), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) and Random Forest (RF), were compared using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the DeLong test.<br />Results: A total of 1856 patients were assigned to the IAT alone Group(I-A), and 1103 patients were assigned to the IAT combination Group(I-C). The 12-month death rates were 31.9% (352/1103) in the I-A group and 50.4% (936/1856) in the I-C group. For the test cohort, in the I-C group, the CatBoost model achieved the best discrimination when 30 variables were input, with an AUC of 0.776 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.833-0.868). In the I-A group, the LGBM model achieved the best discrimination when 24 variables were input, with an AUC of 0.776 (95% CI, 0.833-0.868). According to the decision trees, BCLC grade, local therapy, and diameter as top three variables were used to guide clinical decisions between IAT modalities.<br />Conclusions and Relevance: The MLDSM can accurately stratify prognostic risk for HCC patients who received IATs, thus helping physicians to make decisions about IAT and providing guidance for surveillance strategies in clinical practice.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Middle Aged
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Decision Support Techniques
Clinical Decision-Making
Prognosis
Chemoembolization, Therapeutic methods
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular therapy
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular pathology
Liver Neoplasms therapy
Liver Neoplasms pathology
Machine Learning
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-1827
- Volume :
- 131
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- British journal of cancer
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38971951
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02784-7