Back to Search Start Over

Assessing bolus peak position in CT perfusion: High variance persisting despite age-dependency in a large cohort.

Authors :
Stein T
Kellner E
Mueller-Peltzer K
Elsheikh S
Reisert M
Hosp JA
Bamberg F
Urbach H
Rau A
Source :
European journal of radiology [Eur J Radiol] 2024 Aug; Vol. 177, pp. 111595. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 02.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: CT perfusion (CTP) is a valuable tool in suspected acute ischemic stroke. A substantial variability of the delay between contrast injection and bolus arrival in the brain is conceivable. We investigated the distribution of the peak positions of the concentration time curves measured in an artery (arterial input function, AIF) and - in cases with ischemia - also measured in the penumbra.<br />Methods: We report on 2624 perfusion scans (52 % female, mean age 72.2 ± 14.4 years) with stroke present in 1636 cases. From the attenuation time curves of the AIF and the penumbra, we calculated the respective bolus peak positions and investigated the distribution of the peak positions. Further, we analyzed the bolus peak positions for associations with age.<br />Results: The bolus peaked significantly later in older patients, both in the AIF and in the penumbra (all p < 0.001). In the whole cohort, we found a significant association of age with the bolus peak position of the AIF (ρ = 0.334; p < 0.001). In patients with stroke, age was also associated to the peak position of the AIF (ρ = 0.305; p < 0.001), and the penumbra (ρ = 0.246, p < 0.001). However, a substantial range of peak positions of the AIF and penumbra was noted across all age ranges.<br />Conclusions: This study revealed a strong age-dependency of the contrast bolus arrival in both healthy and ischemic tissue. This variability makes non-uniform sampling schemes, which have been suggested to reduce radiation dose, problematic, as they might not always optimally capture the bolus in all cases.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: EK is a shareholder of and receives fees from VEObrain GmbH, Freiburg, Germany. HU is co-editor of Clinical Neuroradiology, member of the Advisory Board of Biogen and received honoraria for lectures from Biogen, Eisai, and mbits. AR received grants from Berta-Ottenstein-Programme for Clinician Scientists, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-7727
Volume :
177
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38970994
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111595