Back to Search Start Over

Newborn screening analytes and structural birth defects among 27,000 newborns.

Authors :
Lupo PJ
Archer NP
Harris RD
Marengo LK
Schraw JM
Hoyt AT
Tanksley S
Lee R
Drummond-Borg M
Freedenberg D
Shetty PB
Agopian AJ
Shumate C
Rasmussen SA
Langlois PH
Canfield MA
Source :
PloS one [PLoS One] 2024 Jul 05; Vol. 19 (7), pp. e0304238. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 05 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence suggests newborn screening analytes may yield insights into the etiologies of birth defects, yet no effort has evaluated associations between a range of newborn screening analytes and birth defects.<br />Methods: This population-based study pooled statewide data on birth defects, birth certificates, and newborn screening analytes from Texas occurring between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2009. Associations between a panel of thirty-six newborn screening analytes, collected by the statewide Texas Newborn Screening Program, and the presence of a birth defect, defined as at least one of 39 birth defects diagnoses recorded by the Texas Birth Defects Registry, were assessed using regression analysis.<br />Findings: Of the 27,643 births identified, 20,205 had at least one of the 39 birth defects of interest (cases) as identified by the Texas Birth Defects Registry, while 7,438 did not have a birth defect (controls). Among 1,404 analyte-birth defect associations evaluated, 377 were significant in replication analysis. Analytes most consistently associated with birth defects included the phenylalanine/tyrosine ratio (N = 29 birth defects), tyrosine (N = 28 birth defects), and thyroxine (N = 25 birth defects). Birth defects most frequently associated with a range of analytes included gastroschisis (N = 29 analytes), several cardiovascular defects (N = 26 analytes), and spina bifida (N = 23 analytes).<br />Conclusions: Several significant and novel associations were observed between newborn screening analytes and birth defects. While some findings could be consequences of the defects themselves or to the care provided to infants with these defects, these findings could help to elucidate mechanisms underlying the etiology of some birth defects.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.<br /> (Copyright: © 2024 Lupo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1932-6203
Volume :
19
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PloS one
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38968308
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304238