Peer-to-peer validation of Ki-67 scoring in a pathology quality circle as a tool to assess interobserver variability: are we better than we thought?

MLA

Bernhardt, Marit, et al. “Peer-to-Peer Validation of Ki-67 Scoring in a Pathology Quality Circle as a Tool to Assess Interobserver Variability: Are We Better than We Thought?” APMIS : Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica, et Immunologica Scandinavica, vol. 132, no. 10, Oct. 2024, pp. 718–27. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13451.

APA

Bernhardt, M., Weinhold, L., Sanders, C., Hommerding, O., Lau, J.-F., Toma, M., Tischler, V., Schmid, M., Zienkiewicz, T., Hildenbrand, R., Gerlach, P., Zhou, H., Braun, M., Müller, G., Sieber, E., Marko, C., & Kristiansen, G. (2024). Peer-to-peer validation of Ki-67 scoring in a pathology quality circle as a tool to assess interobserver variability: are we better than we thought? APMIS : Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica, et Immunologica Scandinavica, 132(10), 718–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.13451

Chicago

Bernhardt, Marit, Leonie Weinhold, Christine Sanders, Oliver Hommerding, Jan-Frederic Lau, Marieta Toma, Verena Tischler, et al. 2024. “Peer-to-Peer Validation of Ki-67 Scoring in a Pathology Quality Circle as a Tool to Assess Interobserver Variability: Are We Better than We Thought?” APMIS : Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica, et Immunologica Scandinavica 132 (10): 718–27. doi:10.1111/apm.13451.