Evaluating the cancer aging and research group model in predicting immunochemotherapy toxicity among elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Background: The management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in elderly patients is complicated by an increased risk of treatment-related toxicity associated with aging. This study aimed to validate the effectiveness of the Cancer Aging and Research Group (CARG) model in elderly patients with DLBCL receiving rituximab-based chemotherapy.
Methods: In this prospective study, elderly DLBCL patients (aged 65 years or older) receiving rituximab-based chemotherapy were consecutively assessed between August 2016 and December 2021 at one medical center in Taiwan using the CARG model to predict treatment-related toxicity. Patients were categorized into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups based on their CARG scores. Comparisons were made regarding toxicities and survival rates among these groups.
Results: Ninety-one patients, with a median age of 70 years (range 65-96), were included. A substantial 81 % (74 patients) experienced grade 3-5 toxicity. The overall 2-year survival rate was 63.8 % after a median follow-up of 28 months (range, 2-46). The risk of grade 3-5 toxicity was 83 %, 78 %, and 87 %, respectively, among the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups (p = 0.60). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for CARG was 0.521 (95 % CI, 0.376-0.666), which was significantly lower than that for the Eastern Cancer Oncology Group score (ROC = 0.701, 95 % CI, 0.571-0.831). Similarly, compared with those of low-risk patients, hazard ratios for overall survival were 9.22 (95 % CI, 1.23-69.1; p = 0.031) and 14.6 (95 % CI, 1.90-112; p = 0.010) for medium- and high-risk patients, respectively.
Conclusion: While CARG exhibited limitations in predicting treatment-related toxicity in elderly DLBCL patients, it demonstrated potential efficacy in predicting survival outcomes.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)