Back to Search
Start Over
Echocardiography-Derived Forward Left Ventricular Output Improves Risk Prediction in Systolic Heart Failure.
- Source :
-
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography [J Am Soc Echocardiogr] 2024 Oct; Vol. 37 (10), pp. 937-946. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 26. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Although it is widely used to classify patients with heart failure (HF), the prognostic role of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is debated. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that echocardiographic measures of forward left ventricular (LV) output, being more representative of cardiac hemodynamics, might improve risk prediction in a large cohort of patients with HF with systolic dysfunction.<br />Methods: Consecutive stable patients with HF with LVEF <50% on guideline-recommended therapies undergoing echocardiography including the evaluation of forward LV output (i.e., LV outflow tract [LVOT] velocity-time integral [VTI], stroke volume index [SVi], and cardiac index) over a 6-year period were selected and followed for the end point of cardiac and all-cause death.<br />Results: Among the 1,509 patients analyzed (mean age, 71 ± 12 years; 75% men; mean LVEF, 35 ± 9%), 328 (22%) died during a median follow-up period of 28 months (interquartile range, 14-40 months), 165 (11%) of cardiac causes. On multivariable regression analysis, LVOT VTI (P < .001), SVi (P < .001), and cardiac index (P < .001), but not LVEF (P > .05), predicted cardiac and all-cause death. The optimal prognostic cutoffs for LVOT VTI, SVi, and cardiac index were 15 cm, 38 mL/m <superscript>2</superscript> , and 2 L/min/m <superscript>2</superscript> , respectively. Adding each of these measures to a multivariable risk model (including clinical, biohumoral, and echocardiographic markers) improved risk prediction (P < .001). Among the different measures of forward LV output, cardiac index was less accurate than LVOT VTI and SVi.<br />Conclusions: The echocardiographic evaluation of forward LV output improves risk prediction in patients with HF across a wide LVEF spectrum over other well-established clinical, biohumoral, and echocardiographic prognostic markers.<br />Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest None.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Aged
Risk Assessment methods
Prognosis
Ventricular Function, Left physiology
Heart Ventricles diagnostic imaging
Heart Ventricles physiopathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Heart Failure, Systolic physiopathology
Heart Failure, Systolic diagnosis
Stroke Volume physiology
Echocardiography methods
Echocardiography statistics & numerical data
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6795
- Volume :
- 37
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38942218
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2024.06.008